Status: Withdrawn
Intent: To specify that staff members of the athletics department of a member institution must conduct all telephone calls and electronic correspondence related to the recruitment of a prospective student-athlete on a device (cell phone, computer, tablet) issued by the institution; further, such staff members must disclose information, at the institution's discretion, regarding any individual with whom the staff member communicated for recruiting purposes.
Bylaws: Amend 11.1, as follows:
11.1 Conduct of Athletics Personnel.
[11.1.1 through 11.1.3 unchanged.]
11.1.4 Institutionally Issued Devices and Disclosure of Information. Staff members of the athletics department of a member institution must conduct all telephone calls and electronic correspondence related to the recruitment of a prospective student-athlete on a device (cell phone, computer, tablet) issued by the institution. Such staff members must disclose information, at the institution's discretion, regarding any individual with whom the staff member communicated for recruiting purposes.
[11.1.4 through 11.1.5 renumbered as 11.1.5 through 11.1.6, unchanged.]
Source: Big Ten Conference
Effective Date:August 1, 2022
Proposal Category: Amendment
Topical Area: Athletics Personnel
Rationale: Recruiting is the lifeblood of a successful program, building relationships is the lifeblood of recruiting and relationships are commonly built through communication that occurs via telephone calls and electronic correspondence. Institutions may regularly monitor various recruiting communications and some institutions may already require coaches to use institutionally issued devices. Institutions and NCAA enforcement may have limitations in terms of monitoring the activities of coaches (e.g., wiretaps are not feasible), but requiring the use of institutionally issued devices sets a clear expectation of transparency and disclosing information on individuals involved in the recruitment process allows institutions to track the frequency or patterns of such engagement. Such a rule provides an enforcement mechanism in the event coaches do not comply--particularly for those coaches who would intentionally circumvent the rule.
Division I Commitment addressed by proposal: The Commitment to Institutional Control and Compliance
Is the proposal consequential or nationally significant?: Yes.
Is the proposal enforceable and how do the merits outweigh monitoring burdens?: Yes. Requiring the use of institutionally issued devices would set a clear expectation of transparency and would allow institutions to track the frequency or patterns of engagement with individuals related to recruitment of prospective student-athletes.
How does the proposal support student-athlete success/well-being?: Not applicable.
Estimated Budget Impact: Will vary depending on whether an institution currently requires staff members to use institutionally issued equipment for recruiting purposes.
Impact on Student-Athlete's Time (Academic and/or Athletics): None.
Position Statement(s):
Student-Athlete Experience Committee | Opposes | |
Football Oversight Committee | Opposes | |
Legislative Committee | Opposes | |
Women's Basketball Oversight Committee | Opposes | The committee noted: (1) Differences in what institutions provide to coaching staffs; and (2) Currently, institutions and coaches are required to follow NCAA recruiting rules, regardless of device used. |
History
Jul 15, 2019: | Submitted to National Office | |
Nov 14, 2019: | In Progress | |
Feb 7, 2020: | Ready for Vote | |
Apr 1, 2020: | Tabled | Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Council tabled the proposals that remained in the 2019-20 legislative cycle. |
Jul 1, 2021: | In Progress | The Council moved the remaining tabled proposals from the 2019-20 legislative cycle to the 2021-22 legislative cycle. |
Feb 1, 2022: | Withdrawn | Withdrawn by the sponsor. |
Legislative References
Division | Number | Title |
---|---|---|
I | 11.1 | Conduct of Athletics Personnel. |